Seasonal and interannual variability of climate and vegetation indexes across the Amazon

Um artigo publicado nesta segunda-feira na revista da Academia Nacional de Ciências dos Estados Unidos (PNAS) comprova que as florestas preservadas são mais resistentes à seca do que áreas já degradadas, mas demonstra também que existem limites para esta resistência. O estudo oferece uma explicação sobre as divergências entre resultados de campo e dados obtidos por sensoreamento remoto sobre a absorção de carbono na Floresta Amazônia em períodos de estiagem.

Segue abaixo o abstrato do estudo e olink de acesso:


Drought exerts a strong influence on tropical forest metabolism, carbon stocks, and ultimately the flux of carbon to the atmosphere. Satellite-based studies have suggested that Amazon forests green up during droughts because of increased sunlight, whereas field studies have reported increased tree mortality during severe droughts. In an effort to reconcile these apparently conflicting findings, we conducted an analysis of climate data, field measurements, and improved satellite-based measures of forest photosynthetic activity. Wet-season precipitation and plant-available water (PAW) decreased over the Amazon Basin from 1996−2005, and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and air dryness (expressed as vapor pressure deficit, VPD) increased from 2002–2005. Using improved enhanced vegetation index (EVI) measurements (2000–2008), we show that gross primary productivity (expressed as EVI) declined with VPD and PAW in regions of sparse canopy cover across a wide range of environments for each year of the study. In densely forested areas, no climatic variable adequately explained the Basin-wide interannual variability of EVI. Based on a site-specific study, we show that monthly EVI was relatively insensitive to leaf area index (LAI) but correlated positively with leaf flushing and PAR measured in the field. These findings suggest that production of new leaves, even when unaccompanied by associated changes in LAI, could play an important role in Basin-wide interannual EVI variability. Because EVI variability was greatest in regions of lower PAW, we hypothesize that drought could increase EVI by synchronizing leaf flushing via its effects on leaf bud development.

http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/07/28/0908741107.abstract?etoc